The Fiscal Cliff and Reality
The recently-completed budget deal was yet another exercise in delusion. The President claimed to be asking for additional tax revenue of $1.6 Trillion. Sounds like a big number doesn’t it? Well that is the revenue over a ten year period so it is useful to ask how $160 Billion per year stacks up against our monthly budget deficit. The comparison is startling.
Below you will find some deficit numbers obtained from the Financial Management Service, a bureau of the Treasury Department (www.fms.treasury.gov). These numbers are remarkable.
Fiscal Year 2011 Fiscal Year 2012
October 2010: $98.5 Billion October 2011: $120 Billion
November 2010: $137.3 Billion November 2011: $172.1 Billion
The federal government operates on a fiscal year that begins in October, ending in September of the next year. So in the data above, we are looking at the first two months of the last two fiscal years. For the entire 2011 fiscal year, the deficit totaled $1.1 Trillion. Notice first how large the deficit is in each month. More startling is the fact that the deficit is accelerating in size. If the first two months of the 2012 fiscal year are translated into annual totals, the annual deficit would be $1.75 Trillion! And this acceleration should be expected to continue as Obamacare is implemented and more baby boomers collect Social Security and are covered by Medicare. These numbers make clear how serious the situation has become. No economist can predict the future but it seems safe to say that the government’s fiscal problems are staggering in size and unsustainable.
President Obama’s $1.6 Trillion demand for additional revenue is obviously trivial. The government’s deficit dwarfs any additional tax increases brought in by the latest budget deal. The debt ceiling discussion will reveal if there is any hope of avoiding a debt crisis. My guess is that the denial of reality will continue. I hope I am wrong.
Leave a reply to John Seater Cancel reply
Recent Posts
Blogs I Follow
Archives
- February 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- April 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- November 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- April 2015
- February 2015
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- November 2010
Categories
- Business Cycles
- Central Planning
- Climate Change
- Crime Rates
- Deficit Commission
- Democratic Elections
- Drug Shortages
- Economic Growth
- Education
- Eurozone
- Fiscal Cliff
- Fiscal Policy
- Government
- Government Deficit
- Health Care Policy
- Housing Recession
- Hurricane Sandy
- Immigration Policy
- Labor Markets
- Minimum Wage
- Monetary Policy
- Obamacare
- Price Controls
- Prices and Incentives
- Recession
- Sovereign Debt Crisis
- Stop-and-Frisk
- Taxation
- The Affordable Care Act
- Uncategorized
Here are some numbers on federal expenditures for fiscal 2011:
Total outlays $3.60 trillion.
National defense $0.71 trillion
Social Security $0.78 trillion
Medicare $0.49 trillion
Other health care $0.37 trillion
Income security $0.60 trillion
Everything else $0.65 trillion
Budget deficit $1.30 trillion
If national defense were set to zero (obviously ridiculous, but go with it for the sake of the argument), there still would be an annual deficit of $0.59 trillion. A realistic cut in defense may be as much as 20%, which would be $0.14 trillion, leaving a deficit of $1.16 trillion.
There is no reasonable way to raise taxes enough to cover such a large deficit. Total revenue was $2.3 trillion. Taxes would have to be increased by 50% to cover the deficit if only defense is cut by 20% (which itself seems unrealistically large to me).
There is no escaping the conclusion that social spending must be cut and cut by a lot. It gets worse because that conclusion is based on the numbers only for 2011, whereas we know that Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid spending all will increase substantially in the next few years as the baby boomers retire in huge numbers.
So whose programs will get cut? Nobody wants to be first in line. I can’t see any politician taking the lead on cutting somebody’s program, so I predict nothing will be done to address the fundamental problem and the US in a few years will be in the position that Greece, Italy, Spain, and all the other European countries are in now.